Guilfoyle and Donald Trump Jr. in happier times. By the summer of 2025, he had moved on, she had an ambassadorship pending, and, according to the Wall Street Journal, she couldn't cover a $100,000 Amex bill.
The $100,000 Lesson a Trump Ambassador Just Taught You About Being “Rich”
The Jack Hopkins Now Newsletter #1,050: Thursday, October 8th, 2026.
Six days before the biggest job interview of her life, a woman with a reported $25 million net worth was texting a pizza-chain guy from Kentucky the words “honey please.”
That’s the story the Wall Street Journal broke this week about Kimberly Guilfoyle, now U.S. Ambassador to Greece. According to Signal messages the Journal reviewed, on July 3, 2025, with her Senate confirmation hearing set for July 9, she asked Trump donor Eric Deters to wire $100,000 to her American Express account.
She reportedly sent him a PDF with the payment instructions. And…she reportedly told him the wire wouldn’t show up anywhere…because it would go straight to Amex.
Her lawyer says she disputes the messages' authenticity. Deters says they’re real and that he never paid. I’m not here to referee that. But, if you must know, I believe Deters.)
I’m here because of what this story says about you.
Strip the politics out and look at what’s left. Fox News star. Former prosecutor. Former First Lady of San Francisco. Fiancée of the President’s son. Paid $300,000 to headline events. An ambassadorship all but guaranteed. And, if the Journal has it right…a card balance she couldn’t cover without begging.
Fame is not liquidity. Status is not cash. A famous name is not a line of credit. If you learn nothing else from this episode…learn that…because it’s the most expensive lesson there is, and most of the people reading this are on track to learn it the hard way.
You Are Running the Guilfoyle Model
Everybody knows somebody who looks rich.
The lake house. The boat. The Range Rover in the driveway. The office downtown with the view. And…if you ever got a look at that person’s actual bank statement…the one thing that would surprise you is how little is in it.
The image is funded by the next check. Not the last one. The next one.
That’s the Guilfoyle Model. Big front…thin cushion…and a quiet prayer every month that somebody wires money…before the bill hits.
The person running it has a great-looking house…a great-looking car…a great-looking vacation photo…and if you froze their income for forty-five days…they’d be texting their best-off friend something that sounds an awful lot like “honey please.”
They don’t think of themselves as broke.
They think of themselves as temporarily tight. They think the deal that’s about to close… will fix it. The bonus. The promotion. The sale of the business. The ambassadorship. And…they’ve been thinking that for eleven years.
Here’s the ugly truth: looking successful and being successful are two different animals, and the first one eats the second one for breakfast.
Every dollar you spend on the front…is a dollar that isn’t sitting in the account that lets you say no. Guilfoyle, by the Journal’s account…had been paid handsomely to headline patriotic events…and still came up a hundred grand short at the worst possible moment.
Her lawyer’s defense, incidentally…is that she was owed money for those events and hadn’t been paid. Think about that. One of the most connected people in the country… and her cash position depended on getting paid by a guy who used to own Snappy Tomato Pizza.
If that’s her position, what’s yours?
Three Rules the Rich Follow and the Famous Ignore
Rule One: Cash is the only wealth that counts in a crisis.
Net worth is a story you tell at parties. Cash…is what answers the phone when the bill comes. Quietly rich people…the ones you never read about…keep an embarrassing amount of money sitting in boring places doing nothing…specifically so they never have to make a phone call from a position of weakness.
Six months of everything they owe…untouched. Not invested in the “next big thing.” Not “working for them.” Sitting there. Most people find that offensive. They’d rather have the boat. Fine. Enjoy the boat. Just know that when the day comes…you’ll be the one sending the PDF with the wire instructions.
Rule Two: Never, ever ask for money from a position of need.
Read the reported messages again. Urgent. Six days out. “Honey please.” Every ounce of leverage she might have had in that relationship…evaporated…the moment the ask came from desperation instead of strength.
Deters, by his own account…had been dangling up to a million dollars for help with his tax and legal problems. He held the cards. The person with the famous name was the supplicant.
That’s what a thin cushion does: it flips the power in every negotiation you’re in. The buyer who knows you need the sale…beats you on price. The bank that knows you’re stretched…tightens the terms. The donor who knows you’re short decides whether to risk his marriage over it…and tells you no.
Rule Three: If somebody doesn’t want it in writing, you’ve already got your answer.
The detail in this story that should keep you up at night isn’t the Amex bill. It’s the Journal’s report of a message from Guilfoyle telling Deters she wished he’d stop “papering” everything.
Whatever the truth of that exchange…the principle is iron. The party who wants the deal verbal…is the party who does NOT plan to perform. The friend who says “we don’t need a contract between us” is telling you exactly how it ends. Paper everything. Then…paper it again.
The Real Lesson Isn’t About Her
I don’t know what happens to Kimberly Guilfoyle.
Secretary Rubio stood next to her in Athens this week…and said she’s doing a great job. The Democrats want her gone.
The messages may be real or they may not. None of that is the point…and if you walk away from this thinking about politics…you missed it.
The point is that the most famous person in this story was, by one credible account, one bad week away from begging. And…she is not unusual. She is the norm.
She is the doctor with the $900,000 house…and $11,000 in checking. She is the small-business owner…who makes payroll on Thursday…with Friday’s deposit. She is the neighbor with the newest truck on the block…and a second mortgage nobody knows about.
Most people are rich on paper…impressive in public…and broke at the bank. The world rewards the first two…and never asks about the third…until the day it matters, and on that day the first two are worth exactly nothing.
If the Journal’s reporting holds up, Guilfoyle sent hers…
…with a Senate confirmation six days out and the full faith and credit of the United States about to be stamped on her business card.
She wasn’t a scared kid in her twenties. She was a 56-year-old former prosecutor who knew exactly what “it won’t show up anywhere” means, and she typed it anyway.
Then…she sweetened it with a promise to be a rich man’s “Trump ride or die, forever and ever” in exchange for a credit card payment.
That isn’t a cash-flow problem. That’s a character problem…with a cash-flow symptom.
The country didn’t give her an embassy so she could shop for a benefactor on Signal…and…the fact that Deters said no doesn’t make her clean. It makes her lucky.
Today…she’s representing America in Athens…with a lawyer who won’t say which messages are fake…a Secretary of State who’d rather talk about pipelines…and a party that will defend her…right up until the day she becomes inconvenient.
Watch how fast that day comes.
Q&A: What the Guilfoyle Story Doesn’t Tell You
1. Who is Eric Deters, and why was she texting him in the first place?
He’s a 63-year-old Kentucky lawyer, a former congressional candidate, and the former co-owner of Snappy Tomato Pizza.
He ran a conservative gathering called Freedom Fest, and by the Journal’s account he paid Guilfoyle around $300,000 to headline it starting in 2020.
So this wasn’t a stranger. It was a longtime paying relationship that, somewhere along the way, turned into something that looks a lot like a tab.
2. What did Deters want from her?
According to the Journal, he’d been asking her to get the Trump administration to look at his personal tax and legal troubles, and he reportedly offered up to $1 million if she pulled it off. He says she delivered nothing.
So…the story has two people who each believed the other owed them something, and neither one had it on paper.
3. Why does “wire it to American Express” matter so much?
Because money that goes directly to a creditor never passes through the recipient’s bank account. There’s no deposit to explain…no transfer to flag…nothing on a financial disclosure that looks like a gift from a political donor.
Whether or not that was the intent, that’s the effect…and anybody who’s filled out a federal disclosure form…understands why that line is the one investigators will care about most.
4. Was she required to disclose her debts during confirmation?
Yes. Ambassador nominees file a public financial disclosure and go through an ethics review that covers liabilities, including credit card balances above a threshold.
Which raises the obvious question: did a six-figure Amex balance show up on hers…and if not…why not? Nobody in Congress has asked that out loud yet. Somebody will.
5. Is any of this actually illegal?
That depends on facts nobody has established. A gift from a private party to a federal nominee isn’t automatically a crime. A payment made in exchange for official acts is a different animal, and a payment structured specifically to avoid a paper trail invites a prosecutor to ask why.
Her lawyer’s position, that the money was a speaking fee she was owed…is a legal defense as much as a factual one: a debt collected isn’t a gift received. Deters says he owed her nothing. One of them is wrong.
6. This is the second Journal story in two weeks. What was the first one?
Published September 25, it reported that Guilfoyle had been promoting natural gas deals for Aktor…a Greek construction and energy company…across southeastern Europe…and that a lobbyist for the company traveled with her to government meetings in the Balkans.
It also reported that at an embassy dinner in March, she remarked that the U.S. could topple governments and said “we can do that here, too,” which is why she’s now a topic in both the Greek and Romanian parliaments. The Amex story landed on top of that.
7. What has the administration actually said?
Rubio called her an “incredibly effective advocate” for the President’s agenda, stood beside her in Athens this week…and…said the embassy is doing a great job.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum also backed her. The embassy says she complies with all State Department ethics rules. Notice what nobody has said: that the messages are fake. Her own lawyer won’t go that far with specifics.
8. Who’s leading the push to investigate?
Senator Jeanne Shaheen and Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrats on the Senate and House foreign affairs committees. Meeks has written to Rubio that if the reporting is accurate…she’s unfit to serve and should be removed.
The problem for them is arithmetic: they’re in the minority…so…they can send letters and hold press conferences…but…they can’t compel a hearing. If the House flips in November, that changes overnight.
9. Could the State Department inspector general get involved?
It could, and that’s the realistic path to consequences. An IG review doesn’t need a congressional majority…just a referral or a decision to open one. Guilfoyle’s defenders will note she hasn’t been accused of anything by any official body.
Her critics will note that the Trump administration fired or sidelined a long list of inspectors general in 2025, so the independence of whoever would look at this is itself a live question.
10. Why does Greece care about an American credit card bill?
Because the ambassador is the face of the United States there, and Greece is in the middle of a serious energy realignment with Washington, LNG terminals, pipelines… the whole corridor Rubio came to Athens to talk about.
A Greek lawmaker demanded answers in parliament…on the eve of Rubio’s visit…and protests were organized against the trip.
When your envoy’s judgment becomes the story…every deal she touches gets a second look…and the people across the table start wondering whether they’re negotiating with the U.S. government or with her.
#HoldFast
Back soon.
-Jack
Jack Hopkins
P.S. The whole thing hinges on one word that both sides keep using: owed. Her lawyer says Deters owed her. Deters says he owed her nothing. Three hundred thousand dollars changed hands over five years between two grown adults, and apparently neither one can produce a piece of paper that says who owes what to whom.
If you take one practical thing from this column, take that. Whatever’s in your head right now, the deal with your partner, the loan to your brother-in-law, the handshake with the client who “always pays eventually,” go write it down tonight.
Have them sign it. If they won’t, you just learned something. It’s a lot cheaper to learn it now than to learn it on Signal six days before the biggest meeting of your life.
Sources
Election Law Blog — excerpt of the Wall Street Journal report on the $100,000 Amex request
Straight Arrow News — US ambassador asked Trump donor to secretly pay down $100K in credit debt
Fox 5 New York — Guilfoyle reportedly begged Trump donor to pay her $100K credit card bill
Mediaite — “Honey Please”: Ambassador Guilfoyle reportedly begged donor to pay $100,000 debt
KRON4 — Guilfoyle reportedly begged Trump donor to pay her $100K AmEx bill
TMZ — Guilfoyle reportedly asked Trump donor to send $100K to her Amex account
The New Republic — Guilfoyle, the Amex card, and the Deters messages
Political Wire — Lawmakers call for probe into Guilfoyle’s conduct (Oct. 1)
Greek Reporter — Democrats seek probe of Guilfoyle as Rubio publicly backs her
The Daily Wire — Meeks letter to Rubio; Rubio and Burgum statements of support
To Vima — Alleged Guilfoyle remark sparks clash in Greek Parliament ahead of Rubio visit
Ziarul Profit — Rubio praises Guilfoyle amid controversy over Romania remarks; embassy response
Wikipedia — Kimberly Guilfoyle (background, confirmation date)




Someone of X said the didn’t understand how she got the job, and that she must have had dirt on Donald.
No dirt needed.
She raised a fortune for the campaign and stood on stage with the family for years.
The nomination came weeks after the Don Jr. split went public: a soft landing for someone they didn't want as an enemy.
LOYALTY got her the job. LOYALTY keeps her in it.
Yes to all Jack wrote and what in the world are her expenditures to ring up that kind of bill? Too much outflow