Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephanie H's avatar

What I hear is the sound of an iceberg "calving." I heard it on a tour of an iceberg field in Alaska. It starts out as a hissing, then a creaking noise, then a cracking noise like kindling snapping in a fire, and finally this thunderous crash as a huge piece of the iceberg breaks off. I feel like kindling is about to start snapping.

I also feel like we need to be on the look out for Trump to do something incredibly reckless. He feels those walls closing in and you can hear the panic rising every time he speaks.

HKJANE's avatar

The analysis held because it was built on the right foundation: not ideology, but incentive. Loyalty in these systems is a calculation. When the calculation changes, the loyalty changes. Jack is correct about this. What accelerated faster than projected was the credibility gap — the distance between what the executive claims and what institutions confirm. Citizens who cannot determine which account of reality is true do not split the difference. They withdraw from the system that produced both. Eight million people who organized nothing and showed up anyway are not radicals. They are the population authoritarians require to remain passive. Note that they did not.

The rival rise does not require a named successor yet. It only requires enough people inside the system to begin privately rehearsing the sentence: I was always skeptical. When that sentence becomes common enough, the dam does not break. It dissolves. Jack is correct that we are somewhere in the middle of that dissolution. The framework was sound. The world moved faster into it than projected.

#HoldFast

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?