Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HKJANE's avatar

Jack is correct. And the mechanism he identifies has a name in the historical literature: retrograde legitimation. The process by which institutions, already captured, are made to appear neutral while systematically undoing the political gains of a previous era.

File the date: Tennessee’s Memphis redistricting. File the date: Florida’s Sixth Congressional District. File the date: Louisiana’s discarded maps. These are not isolated episodes of political hardball. They form a sequence. Sequences have authors.

Note which word keeps appearing in the defenses offered for each action: fairness. Reconstruction was also dismantled in the name of fairness — fairness to the white voters who felt, as one senator put it in 1875, that Black political power had grown “disproportionate.” The language of proportion, of balance, of neutrality has always been available to those unwilling to say plainly what they mean.

Jack is correct that the more dangerous threat is never the one wearing a hood. Hoods invite resistance. Suits invite negotiation — and negotiation, endlessly prolonged, is itself a tool of attrition.

What the historical record asks of us now is not comfort. It asks a question. When future students examine the legislative record of this decade, alongside the rhetoric used to justify it, alongside the demographic profile of who was consistently targeted — what will they conclude?

You already know the answer.

#HOLDFAST

James Aldridge's avatar

He’s not heavy, he’s my brother…excellent…

50 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?