My Response to the "That's Bullsh*t!" Comments about the Red Hot "NSA Audit" Article that Has Gone Viral
Why dismissing this story too fast could blind you to how power really works.
My Response to the "That's Bullsh*t!" Comments about the Red Hot "NSA Audit" Article that Has Gone Viral
Why dismissing this story too fast could blind you to how power really works.
The Jack Hopkins Now Newsletter #466: Friday, August 1st, 2025. 5:15 pm CST.
If the NSA Really Audited the 2024 Election…Here’s How It Could Have Happened
The rumor is explosive:
An ex‑CIA whistleblower claims the NSA quietly audited the 2024 election…and found Kamala Harris actually won.
Is it true?
I can’t verify it.
But can I show you how something like this could have actually happened…without a single headline?
Absolutely.
The Capability No One Talks About
The NSA lives in the shadows of the internet.
They see everything:
Signals intelligence (SIGINT) from across the globe
Server traffic and metadata flows
Network activity that most Americans don’t even know exists
If they wanted to…the NSA could watch the arteries of an election system in real time…tracking:
Voting machine transmissions in states where reporting touches the internet
County‑to‑state data transfers
Mail‑in ballot verification servers for anomalies
They wouldn’t need to touch a single ballot to see when something didn’t add up.
The Quiet National Security Angle
Here’s where it gets real:
If someone in the intelligence community suspected foreign interference or internal manipulation…a covert monitoring mission could be greenlit.
It wouldn’t look like a classic ballot audit. It would look like this:
Monitoring network traffic for strange patterns
Flagging unauthorized logins or late‑night data dumps
Capturing metadata that reveals if vote reporting systems behaved abnormally
And all of it could be justified as national security intelligence collection…not an “election investigation.”
Why You’d Never Hear About It
Even if the NSA captured smoking‑gun anomalies…here’s what happens next:
The data is immediately classified under national security protocols
Only a tiny handful of insiders see the full report
Any release could be blocked under the argument that exposure risks civil unrest or “foreign exploitation”
Translation:
“We might know something…but you’ll never see it unless someone leaks it.”
This is how massive events can happen in full view of the government but remain invisible to the public.
The Whistleblower Window
For a claim like this to surface…one of two things would need to happen:
An insider decides the truth must come out
They leak, or they hint without proof
The problem?
Blowing the whistle at that level without documentation is career suicide and a federal crime.
Snowden fled the country because he had proof
Reality Winner had documents…and went to prison anyway
A verbal claim without evidence is easy to dismiss and impossible to verify
That’s exactly the zone this rumor lives in.
Could It Happen? Yes. Will We Ever Know?
Here’s the plausible…chilling part:
The NSA could easily see election network anomalies
A quiet internal “audit” could take place under the banner of national security
And the results could be buried forever
All without a single public announcement.
All while the public fights over the surface noise.
Could that mean Harris actually “won” by a metric the public never saw?
Technically…yes.
Will we ever see proof?
Not unless a documented leak blows the doors open…and someone is willing to risk everything to make that happen.
Why This Matters
Whether you believe this rumor or not…it highlights a dangerous truth:
We now live in a world where the most consequential truths can be collected… classified…and hidden from the public forever.
When surveillance and national security intersect with democracy…citizens lose visibility.
I’ll likely have more on this later. Stay tuned.
Best,
-Jack
P.S. If this scenario ever left the shadows…it would rewrite history overnight.
My paid subscribers are getting a step‑by‑step breakdown of how intelligence agencies monitor elections…where the blind spots are…and the pressure points that force transparency.
If you want the inner map…join us inside.
There has never been a doubt in my mind that the election was stolen. Shitler and Musk talked about it at nearly every rally "I don't need your votes. I already have enough votes" "Elon knows computers very well" "We have a secret, don't we JD". They were saying it out loud and Democrats in Congress blew it off as hyperbole.
I received so much backlash when I said it was stolen. The first red flag that they were going to, was months before the election when trump and toadies were claiming that the Democrats were going to steal the election. Every accusation is a confession. Even looking at the attendance at the rallies. trump was paying people to fill seats through Craigslist and Kamala was filling arenas. No math needed.
The election was stolen and I will die on that fucking hill.
I can remember how I felt when Trump allegedly won. Disappointed. Betrayed. Astonished. Okay, devastated. But I struggled on with all the rest of us until, one day I woke up and said, "Wait a minute. This election was rigged." There's no way that POS could have won, notwithstanding Elon Muskox's generous contribution to the effort. I just knew, based on what I had learned about the "winner's" history, that there was no way Kamala Harris could have lost. But, based on the "winner's" behavior, there had to be a way for him to steal it. And Kamala has way too much class to react the way Trump did in 2020.