KASH PATEL’S ARMORED BMW: This Isn’t Just An SUV-It’s A Civic Insult:

Why Kash Patel’s Armored BMW Fleet Should Infuriate Every American

KASH PATEL’S ARMORED BMW: This Isn’t Just An SUV-It’s A Civic Insult:

Why Kash Patel’s Armored BMW Fleet Should Infuriate Every American

The Jack Hopkins Now Newsletter #699: Monday, December 22nd, 2025.

I’m going to be blunt here-furious might even be too mild a word.

Not upset.
Not annoyed.
Not irritated.

Outraged.

Because this isn’t some minor bureaucratic footnote.
It’s not a procurement glitch.
It’s not a rounding error.

It’s a glaring symbol of how detached and entitled parts of our leadership have become…and every American should be angry about it.

Imagine this:

While millions of Americans are struggling to pay rent…fill their gas tanks…put food on the table…keep a roof over their kids’ heads…and make sense of a political class that feels increasingly removed from everyday life…

…the director of the FBI…the nation’s foremost law-enforcement official…insists on a fleet of custom armored luxury BMW X5s…justified with a straight-faced explanation about “security” and “cost savings,” delivered through a sleepy PR statement about “evaluating fleet updates.”

Come on.

This is not a story about vehicles.
This is a civic insult disguised as official business.
And we should treat it as such.

The Facts Alone Should Make Your Blood Boil

Here’s what’s actually happening:

• Instead of the long-standing…domestically produced Chevrolet Suburban…the proven…utilitarian vehicle FBI directors have relied on for decades…Kash Patel pushed for armored BMW X5s as his preferred transportation.

• The stated justification? That the BMWs would make him “less conspicuous.”

Less conspicuous… in Washington, D.C.?
With a visible security detail?
As the FBI director?

That explanation collapses under its own weight.

• The FBI claims this was a cost-saving decision…yet has produced no documentation to substantiate the claim. No side-by-side cost analysis. No lifecycle comparison.

Just: “Trust us.”

When a government agency says “trust us” about spending taxpayer money…and refuses to show its work…that’s not reassurance. That’s a red flag.

• Earlier this year…Patel also attempted to procure a $90–$115 million jet for FBI use …a proposal that reportedly stalled only because the price tag was so staggering it couldn’t be quietly justified.

• Former DOJ and FBI officials haven’t minced words…calling the BMW decision an embarrassment and criticizing it as prioritizing personal image over fiscal responsibility and institutional integrity.

That’s not partisan sniping.
That’s experienced professionals sounding an alarm.

Who Gets To Define “Less Conspicuous”?

Let’s be very clear:

FBI directors already receive full protective details.
This is not optional.
This is not casual.

The Suburban wasn’t chosen because it’s stylish. It was chosen because it is:

• Functional

• Durable

• Cost-effective

• Widely serviced

• Fit for purpose

Now we’re being told a foreign luxury SUV…marketed with features like ballistic protection from rifle fire…is somehow more appropriate for a federal official operating domestically with an armed security team.

That’s not risk management.
That’s status signaling wrapped in security language.

No credible evidence suggests this upgrade materially improves safety.
Plenty of evidence suggests it improves image.

And that distinction matters.

This Isn’t An Isolated Incident

This decision doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

Reports indicate Patel has:

• Used FBI aircraft for trips that appeared personal in nature

• Assigned FBI resources to provide security for a romantic partner

• Pursued extraordinarily expensive upgrades without clear justification

Each incident alone might invite scrutiny.
Together…they form a pattern.

And patterns are what erode trust.

When Did Public Service Turn Into REWARD COLLECTING?

Taxpayers fund government so that:

• Roads are maintained

• Schools function

• Law enforcement is equipped

• Veterans are cared for

• Democracy operates

They do not fund luxury preferences for unelected officials.

When public servants begin to treat taxpayer money as a convenience fund for comfort and prestige…something has gone seriously wrong.

This isn’t stewardship.
It’s indulgence.

And indulgence corrodes institutions.

Let’s Talk About Priorities-Honestly

Every day, Americans hear about:

• Inflation

• Housing shortages

• Healthcare costs

• Student debt

• Veterans’ backlogs

Against that backdrop…watching the FBI director secure a fleet of armored luxury vehicles…and nearly secure a nine-figure jet…feels like a slap in the face.

Not because security doesn’t matter.

But…because proportionality and transparency do.

Leadership should model restraint, not excess.

And No- "It Was Cheaper” Is Not Good Enough

If this truly saved money…the documentation should be public.

Show the numbers.
Show the bids.
Show the maintenance projections.

When none of that is forthcoming…the claim becomes meaningless.

Public money requires public justification.
That’s the social contract.

Without it…confidence collapses.

This Is Bigger Than One Man

This isn’t about demonizing Kash Patel as an individual.

It’s about the precedent.

If this kind of spending becomes normalized…if luxury becomes rebranded as “necessity”…then accountability evaporates.

And once accountability is gone…trust follows.

Why This Matters More Than People Think

People often ask: “Why get worked up about a car?”

Because symbols matter.

Because small excesses signal larger attitudes.

Because when leaders stop worrying about appearances of restraint…they stop worrying about restraint itself.

This is how cynicism spreads.
This is how institutions lose legitimacy.
This is how the public checks out.

You Are Right To Be Angry

Anger doesn’t have to be reckless to be justified.

This is the kind of anger that says:

• “Show us the books.”

• “Respect the taxpayer.”

• “Remember who you work for.”

Democracy depends on that kind of anger.

Quiet acceptance is how rot sets in.

And..As I Mentioned In The Beginning…There’s The Jet

And if the armored luxury BMWs weren’t enough to raise eyebrows…there’s this:

Kash Patel reportedly pushed for an updated FBI jet with an estimated price tag between $90 million and $115 million.

Not because the existing aircraft was unsafe or unusable. Not because of a clearly articulated emergency need presented to the public.

But because…once again, “upgrade” thinking seemed to take precedence over restraint.

The proposal didn’t die because someone suddenly rediscovered fiscal responsibility…it stalled only when the sheer size of the price tag made it impossible to paper over.

Let that sink in.

At a moment when agencies routinely cite budget pressure…staffing gaps…and limited resources…a nine-figure aircraft request was considered reasonable enough to pursue.

That’s not stewardship. That’s entitlement creeping so far into public service that the difference between need and want…appears to have been completely lost.

Final Word

This wasn’t necessary.

It wasn’t transparent.
And it wasn’t handled with the seriousness public trust demands.

This isn’t about a BMW.

It’s about entitlement creeping into public service…justified with vague language and shielded from scrutiny.

And every American who cares about accountability has every reason to be upset.

Because if we don’t call this out…clearly and consistently…we shouldn’t be surprised when it happens again.

And again.

And again.

Let me be clear about something that’s coming.

Let me be very clear about what this is…and what it isn’t.

I’m not here to promise you riches.
Anyone who does that is selling fantasy…not reality.

What I am building is something far more practical…and far more valuable.

Starting in January, each week, for paid subscribers I’m going to tell you exactly what to do.

Not theory. Not commentary.
Concrete actions that take minutes…not hours.

The goal isn’t hype.
The goal is to help you stop making avoidable mistakes…spot risks earlier…and protect yourself from decisions that quietly drain time…money…and leverage.

Because most people don’t fall behind from one big disaster.
They fall behind from small…repeated losses they never see coming.

If you do the things I lay out each week…consistently…and you don’t feel more in control…more prepared…and better positioned to avoid those losses…

I won’t debate you.
I won’t stall.
I won’t upsell you.

I’ll refund your money. All $148

This only works if you apply it.
And if you apply it and it doesn’t improve your decision-making in a way you can feel …that’s on me.

Some will no doubt ask me how I can be confident enough to stand behind this with a refund.

The answer is simple: I don’t roll anything out casually.

Before this ever saw daylight…I tested it.

Not with a survey.
Not with a theoretical outline.
With real people.

I worked through this approach with a small test group of twenty participants…using the same weekly structure…the same kinds of actions…and the same decision-making framework I’m offering now.

The goal wasn’t hype.
It wasn’t promises.
It was to see whether people became more prepared…more decisive…and better at spotting problems before those problems turned into unnecessary losses.

What stood out wasn’t dramatic stories or inflated claims.

It was something quieter…and more telling.

Several people told me that avoiding just one or two decisions they would have otherwise made…more than justified the annual subscription cost on its own.

Not because of some sudden windfall…but because they sidestepped mistakes…delays… or blind spots that would have quietly cost them far more than the price of being here.

That kind of value doesn’t come from predictions.
It comes from better judgment…applied consistently.

And that’s why I’m comfortable saying this:

If you actually do the work…week after week…and you don’t feel more in control…more prepared…and better positioned to avoid avoidable losses…

I won’t debate you.
I won’t stall.
I won’t upsell you.

I’ll refund your money.

Because this wasn’t built on guesswork.
It was built on testing…iteration…and real-world use.

That’s the difference.
Like I said, I’ll be rolling this out, one week at a time…beginning the first week of January.

Who will each weekly plan be sent to?

Every paid subscriber. It’s really as simple as that.

I’m very excited about this. I think you will be too.

More soon.

Stay sharp.

#HoldFast

Back soon,

-Jack
Jack Hopkins